Investigate whether the real and imaginary parts of a constructible complex number are necessarily constructible | Step-by-Step Solution
Problem
If a complex number a+ib is constructible, are its real and imaginary parts a and b also constructible?
🎯 What You'll Learn
- Understand the definition of constructible numbers
- Explore properties of quadratic field extensions
- Analyze relationships between complex numbers and their components
Prerequisites: Complex number theory, Field extensions, Galois theory
💡 Quick Summary
Hi there! This is a really interesting question about constructible numbers and how they behave when we break complex numbers into their components. Think about what it means geometrically when we say a complex number z = a + ib is constructible - we can actually construct the point (a, b) in the coordinate plane using compass and straightedge. Now here's something to consider: if you've already constructed a point in the plane, what basic geometric operations could you perform to find where that point "lands" when you look straight down at the x-axis or straight across at the y-axis? I'd encourage you to think about fundamental compass and straightedge constructions involving perpendicular lines and how they might help you extract the individual coordinates from a point you've already built. You've got the right mathematical instincts to work through this - trust your geometric intuition about what's possible with these classical construction tools!
Step-by-Step Explanation
What We're Solving:
We need to determine whether the real and imaginary parts of a constructible complex number are always constructible themselves. This is a fundamental question about how constructibility behaves when we decompose complex numbers into their components.The Approach:
To tackle this problem, we'll use the geometric interpretation of constructible numbers and examine how we can perform operations with compass and straightedge. The key insight is that if we can construct a complex number geometrically, we should be able to "project" it onto the real and imaginary axes to find its components.Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall what constructible means A complex number z = a + ib is constructible if we can construct the point (a, b) in the coordinate plane using only compass and straightedge, starting from the points (0,0) and (1,0).
Step 2: Visualize the geometric setup If z = a + ib is constructible, then we can construct the point P = (a, b) in the plane. This point represents our complex number geometrically.
Step 3: Think about projecting onto axes If we have constructed the point P = (a, b), we can construct points on the real axis at distance |a| from the origin, and points on the imaginary axis at distance |b| from the origin.
Step 4: Use perpendicular construction We can:
- Drop a perpendicular from P to the real axis (x-axis), which gives us the point (a, 0)
- Drop a perpendicular from P to the imaginary axis (y-axis), which gives us the point (0, b)
- Draw the line through P parallel to the y-axis (perpendicular to x-axis)
- This intersects the x-axis at (a, 0)
- Similarly for the y-axis intersection at (0, b)
The Answer:
Yes! If a complex number a + ib is constructible, then both its real part a and imaginary part b are constructible real numbers. This follows from the fact that we can always drop perpendiculars from a constructed point to the coordinate axes using compass and straightedge.Memory Tip:
Think of it as "projection preserves constructibility" - if you can build the point, you can always project its shadow onto each axis to get the components! It's like shining light from above and to the side to cast shadows on both the x and y axes.This result is quite intuitive when you think about it geometrically - constructibility shouldn't be "lost" when we simply look at the individual coordinates of a point we've already constructed!
⚠️ Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Assuming constructibility of complex number implies constructibility of its parts
- Misunderstanding the precise definition of constructible numbers
- Failing to consider the full implications of field extensions
This explanation was generated by AI. While we work hard to be accurate, mistakes can happen! Always double-check important answers with your teacher or textbook.

Meet TinyProf
Your child's personal AI tutor that explains why, not just what. Snap a photo of any homework problem and get clear, step-by-step explanations that build real understanding.
- ✓Instant explanations — Just snap a photo of the problem
- ✓Guided learning — Socratic method helps kids discover answers
- ✓All subjects — Math, Science, English, History and more
- ✓Voice chat — Kids can talk through problems out loud
Trusted by parents who want their kids to actually learn, not just get answers.

TinyProf
📷 Problem detected:
Solve: 2x + 5 = 13
Step 1:
Subtract 5 from both sides...
Join our homework help community
Join thousands of students and parents helping each other with homework. Ask questions, share tips, and celebrate wins together.

Need help with YOUR homework?
TinyProf explains problems step-by-step so you actually understand. Join our waitlist for early access!