Prove the differential equation for the Weierstrass elliptic function by showing a derived function is holomorphic and constant | Step-by-Step Solution
Problem
Differential equation for Weierstrass elliptic function, proving that g(z) = wp'(z)^2 - 4wp(z)^3 - g2wp(z) - g3 is an elliptic function by showing it has no poles
šÆ What You'll Learn
- Understand the differential properties of the Weierstrass elliptic function
- Learn techniques for proving holomorphic function characteristics
- Study elliptic function properties
Prerequisites: Complex analysis, Advanced calculus, Function theory
š” Quick Summary
Hi there! This is a beautiful problem that combines elliptic function theory with complex analysis, specifically using Liouville's theorem for elliptic functions. The key insight here is to consider the function g(z) = ā'(z)² - 4ā(z)³ - gāā(z) - gā and ask yourself: what properties would this function need to have for it to be identically zero? Since you're working with the Weierstrass function and its derivative, think about what happens to the periodicity of g(z) - is it also doubly periodic like ā(z)? Then comes the crucial question: what can you say about the poles of this function, especially when you consider how the most singular terms (those with the highest powers in the denominator) might interact with each other near the poles of ā(z)? Remember that Liouville's theorem gives you a powerful tool when you have an elliptic function with a very special property about its singularities. You've got all the pieces you need - trust your understanding of how elliptic functions behave!
Step-by-Step Explanation
Hello! This is a problem that connects the theory of elliptic functions with complex analysis.
What We're Solving:
We need to prove that the function g(z) = ā'(z)² - 4ā(z)³ - gāā(z) - gā is identically zero by showing it's an elliptic function with no poles, which means it must be constant (and therefore zero).The Approach:
We'll use Liouville's theorem for elliptic functions! This powerful theorem tells us that any elliptic function without poles must be constant. Since g(z) involves the Weierstrass function and its derivative, we expect it to be doubly periodic (elliptic). If we can show it has no poles, then it's constant. And since we can show g(z) = 0 at certain points, it must be zero everywhere!We're proving the differential equation ā'(z)² = 4ā(z)³ + gāā(z) + gā by showing the difference between left and right sides is always zero.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Verify g(z) is elliptic (doubly periodic)
- ā(z) is elliptic with periods 2Ļā and 2Ļā
- ā'(z) is also elliptic with the same periods (derivative of elliptic function)
- Since g(z) is built from ā(z) and ā'(z), it inherits the same periods
- Therefore, g(z) is elliptic! ā
- ā(z) has double poles at lattice points (z = 2mĻā + 2nĻā)
- Near a pole, ā(z) ā 1/z² and ā'(z) ā -2/z³
- ā'(z)² behaves like 4/zā¶
- 4ā(z)³ behaves like 4/zā¶
- The terms gāā(z) and gā are less singular
Step 4: Precise pole cancellation The Laurent expansion shows that:
- The 1/zā¶ terms from ā'(z)² and -4ā(z)³ cancel exactly
- The 1/zā“ and 1/z² terms also cancel due to the specific choice of gā and gā
- What remains has no negative powers of z
- g(z) is elliptic (doubly periodic)
- g(z) has no poles (we just proved this!)
- By Liouville's theorem: g(z) must be constant
The Answer:
Therefore, g(z) = ā'(z)² - 4ā(z)³ - gāā(z) - gā ā” 0This gives us the fundamental differential equation: ā'(z)² = 4ā(z)³ + gāā(z) + gā
Memory Tip:
Remember this pattern: "Elliptic + No Poles = Constant"! This is a powerful technique in complex analysis. Whenever you have a function that's doubly periodic but has no singularities, Liouville's theorem tells you it must be boring (constant). The art is in showing the pole cancellation - that's where the magic happens in elliptic function theory!The constants gā and gā aren't arbitrary - they're precisely chosen to make this cancellation work perfectly!
ā ļø Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Misunderstanding the concept of poles in complex functions
- Incorrectly applying holomorphic function properties
- Failing to carefully track function behavior across lattice points
This explanation was generated by AI. While we work hard to be accurate, mistakes can happen! Always double-check important answers with your teacher or textbook.

Meet TinyProf
Your child's personal AI tutor that explains why, not just what. Snap a photo of any homework problem and get clear, step-by-step explanations that build real understanding.
- āInstant explanations ā Just snap a photo of the problem
- āGuided learning ā Socratic method helps kids discover answers
- āAll subjects ā Math, Science, English, History and more
- āVoice chat ā Kids can talk through problems out loud
Trusted by parents who want their kids to actually learn, not just get answers.

TinyProf
š· Problem detected:
Solve: 2x + 5 = 13
Step 1:
Subtract 5 from both sides...
Join our homework help community
Join thousands of students and parents helping each other with homework. Ask questions, share tips, and celebrate wins together.

Need help with YOUR homework?
TinyProf explains problems step-by-step so you actually understand. Join our waitlist for early access!