TinyProf
TinyProf
Join Waitlist

Prove that a continuous and injective function on an interval is strictly monotone through a detailed case analysis | Step-by-Step Solution

MathReal Analysis
Explained on January 17, 2026
📚 Grade college🔴 Hard⏱️ 1+ hour

Problem

A non-case wise proof for a theorem on continuous functions: If f is a continuous and injective function on an interval I, then f is strictly monotone.

🎯 What You'll Learn

  • Understand proof techniques for function properties
  • Apply Intermediate Value Theorem in proofs
  • Analyze function behavior through rigorous mathematical reasoning

Prerequisites: Intermediate Value Theorem, Function continuity, Set theory basics

💡 Quick Summary

This is a beautiful proof in real analysis that connects continuity, injectivity, and monotonicity! The key insight is to think about what would happen if a continuous, one-to-one function tried to "change directions" on an interval - could it go up and then down (or vice versa) without violating one of its given properties? I'd encourage you to consider using proof by contradiction here: assume the function is not strictly monotone, which means you can find three points where the function changes direction, and then think about what the Intermediate Value Theorem tells us about the values the function must take between those points. What happens when a continuous function goes up from one point and then back down to another - what values must it hit along the way, and how might this create a problem for injectivity? Try sketching a simple curve that goes up then down and see if you can make it one-to-one - this visual approach might help you see why these properties work together so elegantly!

Step-by-Step Explanation

🎯 What We're Solving:

We need to prove that if a function f is both continuous and injective (one-to-one) on an interval I, then f must be strictly monotone (either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing throughout the entire interval).

🧭 The Approach:

This is a beautiful theorem that connects three fundamental concepts in real analysis! Here's why this makes intuitive sense: imagine trying to draw a continuous curve that never repeats any y-value (injective) - you'll find you can't "wiggle up and down" because that would force you to repeat y-values. The curve must consistently go in one direction.

Our strategy will be a proof by contradiction combined with careful analysis of what happens when we assume the function isn't strictly monotone.

📝 Step-by-Step Solution:

Step 1: Set up the contradiction

  • Assume f is continuous and injective on interval I, but f is NOT strictly monotone
  • This means f is neither strictly increasing nor strictly decreasing on I
  • Therefore, we can find points where f "changes direction"
Step 2: Find the troublesome points Since f isn't strictly monotone, there must exist points a < b < c in I such that:
  • Either f(a) < f(b) > f(c) (f goes up then down), OR
  • f(a) > f(b) < f(c) (f goes down then up)
Let's work with the first case: f(a) < f(b) > f(c)

Step 3: Apply the Intermediate Value Theorem Since f is continuous:

  • On [a,b]: f increases from f(a) to f(b)
  • On [b,c]: f decreases from f(b) to f(c)
Now, consider any value y between min{f(a), f(c)} and f(b).

Step 4: Show the contradiction By the Intermediate Value Theorem:

  • There exists x₁ ∈ [a,b] such that f(x₁) = y
  • There exists x₂ ∈ [b,c] such that f(x₂) = y
Since a < b < c, we have x₁ ≠ x₂, but f(x₁) = f(x₂) = y.

This violates the injectivity of f! 🎯

Step 5: Complete the proof The same argument works for the case f(a) > f(b) < f(c). Since assuming f is not strictly monotone leads to a contradiction with injectivity, we conclude that f must be strictly monotone.

The Answer:

The theorem is proven by contradiction. A continuous, injective function on an interval cannot "change direction" because doing so would force it to repeat output values (by the Intermediate Value Theorem), violating injectivity. Therefore, it must be strictly monotone in one direction throughout the entire interval.

💡 Memory Tip:

Think of it as the "No U-Turns Theorem"! A continuous, one-to-one function can't make U-turns because the Intermediate Value Theorem would force it to hit the same height twice, breaking the one-to-one property. Once it picks a direction (up or down), it's committed! 🚗➡️

Encouragement: This proof beautifully showcases how different theorems work together - continuity gives us the Intermediate Value Theorem, and injectivity provides the constraint that creates our contradiction. You're connecting major concepts in real analysis! 🌟

⚠️ Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Overlooking case-by-case analysis details
  • Misapplying continuity and injectivity properties
  • Failing to use contradiction in proof strategy

This explanation was generated by AI. While we work hard to be accurate, mistakes can happen! Always double-check important answers with your teacher or textbook.

Prof

Meet TinyProf

Your child's personal AI tutor that explains why, not just what. Snap a photo of any homework problem and get clear, step-by-step explanations that build real understanding.

  • Instant explanations — Just snap a photo of the problem
  • Guided learning — Socratic method helps kids discover answers
  • All subjects — Math, Science, English, History and more
  • Voice chat — Kids can talk through problems out loud

Trusted by parents who want their kids to actually learn, not just get answers.

Prof

TinyProf

📷 Problem detected:

Solve: 2x + 5 = 13

Step 1:

Subtract 5 from both sides...

Join our homework help community

Join thousands of students and parents helping each other with homework. Ask questions, share tips, and celebrate wins together.

Students & ParentsGet Help 24/7Free to Join
Join Discord Community

Need help with YOUR homework?

TinyProf explains problems step-by-step so you actually understand. Join our waitlist for early access!

👤
👤
👤
Join 500+ parents on the waitlist